Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 30.04.2015, 13:06 Язык оригинала: Русский       #438
Гуру
 
Регистрация: 24.05.2009
Сообщений: 1,972
Спасибо: 4,937
Поблагодарили 4,308 раз(а) в 1,547 сообщениях
Репутация: 8082
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от K-Maler Посмотреть сообщение
Reveal the alias has no right to the one who took the responsibility to take it with him to act, for example, the publisher of the book or the site moderator.
But there may be times when the audience "its course" will know who is who... And the audience, i.e. all who concealed the name of, any such obligations not subject to...
No, not so, "know" and "to reveal/to disclose" - two big differences. "Know" is possible without the consent of the author, and even to communicate to the other in a private conversation, but the "reveal" or "to disclose", i.e. publicly announced in the media - nobody. And the journalist ZOLOTONOSHA whose name resembles an alias, it must be well known.

For reference: article 19 and 1265 of the civil code
"5. Harm caused to a citizen as a result of a violation of his right to the name or nickname shall be compensated in accordance with this Code."

System GARANT: http://base.garant.ru/10164072/3/#ixzz3YmlnUMZP

On the procedure of protection of moral rights, which include the right to aliases.



Маруся вне форума   Ответить с цитированием