Kirill, thank you, right, the first night - for you. I have all those links and did not spread, because at the same forum and found them. That is, I already read.
Otuda and emerged, in particular my doubts. So for example:
Цитата:
Сообщение от LCR
The first of the three can be a creation Kunna (albeit with the same success it may belong to the virtual cutter heads 80 percent of sktualnogo art).
Second - in my opinion, very good - looks like a Calder.
Third - like Louise Bourgeois.
Now just find that in all three cases I got a finger, say, in the eyes.
That's my reputation and finita 
Master, as you would expect, I do not go to such events: p |
My views, as you might guess - are built on the
axiom of anarchy allegedly ordered and the current art market, especially - in Russia, where a convertible currency - and then no.
And actually the reason for the activation was a banal desire to expand the range of his property. I fear for the potential
loss for money. Part of the existing.
The only really argued throughout the dispute the argument of
LCR on the "old masters" (too lazy to look for a link already, but you are there, and many "thanks" is set, probably, remember), I, incidentally, is embodied in live "practically. Only podtvrdiv their doubts. This, recall, is a "long" money.
So. Insight without insiders. : shy:
PS Please do not find fault with "
axiom anarchy". This is not a claim for the opening of a new style, and colloquial epithet. This is my language is. To mental illness, k.s.v. and so on. - Not applicable. By origin I am computer engineer, system analyst. I love not only to analyze but to synthesize, as well as to express more precisely. Was brought up on ZHvaneckogo. And now try to comprehend the harmony and long texts. Generally not for personal gain but for fun.
P.s. p.s.
After a hike at the weekend the museum, I am the way, aesthetically inclined still to Russian. But very superdorogo. Those "yesterday, but five" many were available ...