LCR,
so too harshly. His De Chirico, Fontana, Morandi, Cezanne was among many artists, under this reasoning can be "slaughtered" half of the 20 th century Russian art, including the vanguard of the 1910-ies, sezannistov, and even more so our post-war art, including securities of the metaphysicians. If the intention to build a comparative series, then everybody has to do: and Nemukhin, and anyone, including Veisberg.
In my opinion, de Chirico at Krasnopevtsev ended in the early 1960's (approximately
1962) and if the ideas can be found consonance with someone (I can not name from memory), then at least the technology, according to the methods by kropotilivosti much does one can hardly find the analogue.
Or those same big things Plavinsky ... everything. And the astounding scale with delalizatsii so high, and cold, and decoration. Watch live - quite impressive.
Of the several proposed qwerty, the success of the west I would put more on the ruble and Nemukhin (not being a fan of their beliefs). Argument: their works are at the junction of decorative arts and design, the series of images are recognizable, there is irony and aggression that makes them still today. I kazhdetsya for the Western audience, they understand. As understood by the same E. Steinberg. But Krasnopevtsev may not understand - he was too handsome in a literal sense, though not of our century. Deeply loved by me Yakovlev - an innovator, but, again, very Russian painter.