Grif, why are You so... Article, obviously, read, "creative" it has processed, and this little miss:
"Possible plagiarism and partial use of someone else's work or citation without reference to the source."
Because the information from here:
http://www.copyright.ru/ru/documents...h_prav/plagiat Or am I not right?
[QUOTE="iside;1797263"] I am interested in this practical point, if I, for example, as a young gallery owner decides to put an artist who works in someone's style and I can see it, but will present it as just "inspiration", and suppose there will come a competitor and then wrote in his Twitter, they put one, which is all copied from Takahata@
Also recently remembered this topic. Maybe
iside, will be interested in. Just in case Patrick Carew (Patrick Cariou) against Richard Prince (Richard Prince) and was the first precedent. Patrick Carew was not limited to a claim of copyright infringement to Richard Prince, and filed a lawsuit to the art gallery Gagosian Gallery Inc. And its owner Larry Gagosian. The basis for the claim was that the gallery has exhibited the work of Prince, published a catalogue of paintings, and sold them for more than $ 10 million.
In the first instance judge decided to withdraw the remaining copies, negatives, CDs, etc. as well as unsold paintings and destroy; and gallery and Gagosian obliged to notify all owners of the paintings on the violations of copyright.
And the court of appeal overturned this decision in the most part (i.e., recognized the disputed only 5 papers out of 30), with great satisfaction Gagosian.
Details here:
http://www.theartnewspaper.com/artic...t-appeal/29342