Цитата:
Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky
I agree. Always with irony attitude to the statements of its type-hyped.
If there is nothing like you are "spin"?
Rothko? - "Spin" ...
Malevich? - Rasraskrutili "...
About Chagall even says so!
|
And if we apply the term-opened? Hyped it invested a lot of money in advertising, first obtain the property or obtaining the right to property. Otherwise, simply unscrew the stupid not having run at least twice potsent covering spending in 4. Or related dela.Poskolku question in income then who is to pay. But he also hopes to profit from the next sale and bought it if it does not get it means he had been deceived. On the face of a fraudulent transaction. But if the buyer makes a profit, he will come over to buy himself and with him podet crowd willing to buy and this is an honest business and prestige. In the west, all have already tried this and learned by heart so they say an intelligent person could be fooled only once
[color="# 666686"]Posted by 21 minutes[/color]
Цитата:
Сообщение от nikola
Unfortunately in the world are used to measure the value of money signs.
We must acknowledge that most people begin to look at the picture with great interest, if they find out that it is expensive. In this sense, the art market plays a big role. If the paintings were neither will want them, interest in the art could divide.
|
Agree, it would be strange if a work of art stailo a few - all would say that it is bad art-trash, but someone who thought or has bought one for the life of 5, 10 pictures. All thought, and suddenly he is right and rushed to buy, but the things some of the artist is limited and they rachinayut more expensive and it is from the fact that someone opened talent.