Цитата:
Сообщение от vyadem
who is as true to the signature is not on the front side, and on the back?
I know many people who immediately raises the question of "why it was impossible to leave the autograph on the work itself? ... The back and I can write
|
These many people need to ask this question to the artist himself, and not to those who now shows or offers. Typically, these people belong to the category "yasamnehuzhenarisuyu.
So where, in fact, offering a picture knows why there are no captions?
Signature become valued relatively recently, when it was the commercialization of art and the market has got a lot of works.
By and large signature requirement came from the west, where the foreign gallery owners to sign the proof of the authenticity of the brand and began to demand to sign the back of the work (in the absence of the author's signature), and even photographed the owner of this work in hand.
Many of our artists, how to properly discussed here, not in the habit of signing their works, without even thinking about their future. But times change, the rules too, but the artist has, alas, no.
For example, I managed to convince IV Sorokina sign all his work, which he later admitted correct. But VI Ivanov, to my opinion not heeded and signs are not all work. Here's ask him, why?
To avoid any misunderstandings gallerist Shishkin, for example, requests heirs to authenticate the work on the back. This is his, and the buyers, too, satisfied.
And sometimes another buyer, despite the fact that he takes work in the family, requires a formal examination. So he has other goals than collecting, or is it because of its "professional" work was not used to trust anyone.
I will not now where to look, but this subject has been discussed at the forum.