Цитата:
Сообщение от DSF
I often do not put a signature, simply because I do not find place for it. Signature - a color stain, which can disrupt the existing system. Theoretically, the signature must be planned in advance, in practice it is not always possible.
|
Thank you
DSF for the response of the artist! Pictorial harmony, a system of color - is the main signature of the artist. If an artist is present, that is, has a distinct artistic personality, then why did he sign? An artist should not care about casualties collectors, he must do! Although there are examples of reasonable compromise. For example, the artist Krymov Nikolai Petrovich always set a modest signature on his work, somewhere in the corners, a pencil, but so that they could read. Or did not set at all. Of course, it is possible that the artist puts his signature is often unaware of how, why and how he does it. There are also examples and informed (to some extent) the use of a signature as a carrier of some kind of additional information to address the complex behavioral problems of the artist. I mean feature Konstantin Andreevich Somov always indicate the date of creation of each of his works, and it absolutely does not contradict the fact that Somov very meticulously kept a diary, recording the important details. Perhaps the signature could tell a lot about the identity of the master thoughtful researcher. Identify as a kind of dependence of the size, brightness, presence or absence of a signature on the degree of artistic talent is not possible. Also this is not possible to identify patterns and build on this consistent theory of genius. The artist, however like any other man, is a mystery. So any attempt such as those being undertaken by Cesare Lombroso, are doomed to fail (or are scientific hypotheses until, until replaced by new ones). Man is unknowable, because he is the image and likeness of God.