Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 16.04.2009, 13:21 Язык оригинала: Русский       #41
Гуру
 
Аватар для наследник
 
Регистрация: 08.02.2009
Адрес: Петербург
Сообщений: 2,497
Спасибо: 278
Поблагодарили 598 раз(а) в 403 сообщениях
Репутация: 893
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от dedulya37 Посмотреть сообщение
And that, it should be in a ball gown with pearls home to be?
And that, the artists just celebrated persons portrayed?
Do not approach a painting a century ago with the yardstick of modern photography. Although, of course, there is now and Christmas ...

... However, the whole debate not worth a damn. Suffice it to soberly assess the quality of painting.
  Uvekshis thanking each other for trivial reasons, you, colleagues, ignored the very substantial level of skill-specificity of the artist.
  Moreover, in this case do not have something special "to look at."
  Photo of this time gives the infrequent opportunity to test their ability to evaluate this particular component - the quality of painting itself.
But, alas! Internet, apparently, could not have anything specifically "tell" about it.
So - this weather! - In the near future all discard the subject and with the same ardor, fervor will enter a new debate, increasing the number of thanks from each other, but again little clarifying on the merits.

(Or druzhnenko I was subjected to ostracism for the truth-the uterus, saw this message "another blatant rudeness.")



наследник вне форума   Ответить с цитированием