Цитата:
Сообщение от Yaya
Tjutchev, I do not I draw the attention of the popular scientific encyclopedias. To understand the theme of scholasticism, which to you seems so simple, you need to start to turn to primary sources (if you're interested in this topic, for example, St. Thomas, it is also called the Prince of Scholastics) and only then try to explain to them using modern processes. Since this forum to all this has no relevance, I see no point in continuing this discussion. all good
|
The people you are not authority? I understand ... But, maybe,
foreign philosopher Wundt convince you. : confused:
Now the word "Scholasticism" applies not only to medieval philosophy, but also everything that a modern education and in academic discourse but is somewhat like the content and form sholastitsizm - and is usually applied as a negative epithet. Essence sholastitsizma consists of Wundt, "firstly, that the main task of scientific research relies in finding a firmly established and the various issues are equally applicable schematics concepts, and secondly, that attaches too much importance to some general concepts and for them and the words denoting these concepts, resulting in extreme cases, an empty game concepts and words is replaced by the actual facts about the place from which these concepts are distracted.
http://www.wikiznanie.ru/ru-wz/index.php/Схоласты