Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 13.04.2009, 12:58 Язык оригинала: Русский       #33
Авторитет
 
Аватар для Art-lover
 
Регистрация: 25.10.2008
Адрес: Киев
Сообщений: 825
Спасибо: 1,587
Поблагодарили 2,452 раз(а) в 384 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 2
Репутация: 3846
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от LCR Посмотреть сообщение
I read all these questions /answers on tapes and remember the context.
I do not accept the approval of ED that "dx" may refer to works of art "because it implies that the only criterion for membership of the art is the intention.
I strongly disagree with this. For me, the only criterion is the talent (yes, I know, this category is much more vague and subjective, but I was happy with it, but in fairness I do not pretend).
I have almost the same view on these things.

But it is clear that many participants in this discussion, little attention has been given a semitone. Nobody, for example, paid no attention to that ED eliminated from personal assessment artistic level exhibit Manzoni and stresses that does not consider himself bankusdermom work of art. However, explains in this connection that the coordinate system of contemporary artistic process is mainly based on the conventional approach to art, ie that any real or virtual object (or its lack) can be roughly defined as an object of art (with a small letter !!!) simply by putting in this system of coordinates.

Unlike ED, I am not an adherent of this approach, but that is another question.



Art-lover вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 6 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо Art-lover за это полезное сообщение:
Allena (13.04.2009), gans (13.04.2009), K-Maler (13.04.2009), LCR (13.04.2009), voloviks (18.04.2009), Сима (13.04.2009)