IMHO, there is one rather delicate moment . Examination , which includes the whole complex of historical and art history and chemical- technological research , is not such a difficult thing for honest professionals . If there is no , as we now say , " motivation " of experts, with most things there is no particular difficulty in the plane of a modern forgery or authentic thing of its time.
If a thing is "in time " , then enter into force the second plane reasoning - confirmation or denial of authorship. And in the second case, all these ripples -attributed to ..., the circle of .., in the manner of ... etc.
And here, too, it all depends on the honesty and " unmotivated " experts.
But what about those cases where the back door pulls machine goes "expert" , right in the trunk " explores " the work and wrote on the back of your photos " opinion." And this, incidentally , is an indulgence that protects the seller from fraud charges .
And to help in this case may not appeal to the honesty of experts - is too general and naive. May protect a written sales contract , clearly stipulated that a person buys , and that he sold.
If you buy a painting contract Shishkin , and you later sold a copy or perelitsovannogo Fedorova or Welz , the deployment of an amicable transaction or back court.
It seems to me that this kind of scheme would be most preferred. A judge under the decision of the court would return the money received for their substandard work or even be honored and private definitions.
|