Цитата:
Сообщение от Artem
Here, let me disagree with you , on the facts of publications in " directories fakes " was not checked ... just before and after their release. And all that have not published Contested documentary evidence (that three issues of /expert Petrov and two release /TG experts and timing .
|
Why not agree .... that Mr. Petrov could be wrong ? So he himself repeatedly made during GTG ..... or is it all forgotten , and then he like and not to blame, who's talking ... You want to say that every published work , there are two to refute conclusions eligible organizations to carry out examination ? Public and collectors , what is the evidence ... so emotions.
But in the case of an error , will respond quite Roschin and not an expert -
experts we can be wrong <! - ~ 1 ~ -> . Eg for spreading false information discrediting reputation - he's a fake if acknowledges the work to publish . <! - ~ 1 ~ -> , and this may not be so . Three directories - it's not all art is sold on the market, still ahead, directory does not document the way .
But to your specific and direct question - why are you interested in recently questions relating exclusively fakes ? Not whether you have what the attitude to redistribution of the market expertise ? Soon there will be a new "place of examination " Are not your interest with this .
Or anything personal ! <! - ~ 1 ~ ->
P.S. His film is overgrown with moss , all worn with it , by the way is not better than journalistic little articles . Especially ridiculous these inserts - slicing of comedies.