Цитата:
Сообщение от sergejnowo
|
Roschin always distinguished categorical statements. Fakes became less, not more! Many pointed out , had a special view, subjective, advantageous to him scandals expertise !
Everything is wonderful , let publishes . He wrote - " any expert can be wrong " and should be held accountable material . And he himself , with his advisers will also serve as expert ? He will be responsible also material ? Or is he a priori infallible ? Why he took it better versed than the experts ? And if , by mistake publish real ? Suffer at least three parties - the expert seller, the buyer . Let then and it guarantees its financial responsibility . Who? And on the basis of examinations which recognizes the work of fake? He also has " The most independent of independent examinations " - examination ? Who are the experts - Petrov ? Then let them meet all the money. What wrong is always in the same direction ? Try to wash , dirt, if by mistake your work falls into forgery , not one auction it will not take. Many experienced experts are not so categorical and in no hurry to declare immediately counterfeit work and recommend to wait in the hope of discovering new materials for a particular author.