Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 06.04.2009, 18:12 Язык оригинала: Русский       #14
Гуру
 
Регистрация: 09.11.2008
Сообщений: 3,850
Спасибо: 8,042
Поблагодарили 5,249 раз(а) в 1,399 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 6
Репутация: 8539
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от passers 305385
I think that in this case is somewhat incorrect to speak of gallery owners, quietly selling works of art at exorbitant prices.
I think that the gallery owners have the right to do, sell what he has for any maximum amount of this ivlekaya respectively the maximum possible benefit. In the end, he sells otobrannue them personally, according to his taste now. And the better the taste of the dealer may be the higher price of the product. This is when the sale is not just painting and signature style and more style zhizni.Tsena may be too high Similarly, the auctioneer is selling because he thinks nuzhnym.Pochemu is not correct? If the price is small, it makes sense gallerist buy and sell their expensive klientam.Esli prices are the same everywhere it is in my opinion bad for the market, no game. Monopoly.



SAH вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 2 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо SAH за это полезное сообщение:
Евгений (06.04.2009), Жар-птица (07.04.2009)