I think that in this case is somewhat incorrect to speak of gallery owners, quietly selling works of art at exorbitant prices. When the dealer invests heavily in PR specific artist (do not forget about the restoration of quality and design) the price of his works, of course, raises, and the proportion invested money. Of course, dealers, earning the "throwing" works of art, such things are not particularly think. And what do you think should be a feeling person who has invested quite a lot of money in the promotion of the artist's, when for no reason, without rhyme or reason to the market throw the works of this artist dumped?
Returning to the question of ethics I have described situations. Perhaps my understanding of the market, shall we say, naive, but the representative of the auction house, such as a dustpan in my opinion, should be "in the subject and have an idea of how large projects are being implemented in certain market segments, and somehow correlate their pricing policies with these realities.
|