Цитата:
Сообщение от Eugene
No need to disassemble it, it's just the opinion of a gallerist (talented) and all.
|
Eugene, whose views are not necessary to disassemble? It would be nice to post the list ...
Talents outstanding former gallery owner, no one thought detract from, but they have, to my regret, many fans.
For example, in Kiev, some of the current grand gallery owners at the time literally took the leadership of the idea of a forced Marat brendirovanii market aktualschikov through willful purpose-dtsatki artistic genius and the principle of discrimination of their potential competitors, are not included in the calendar.
Incidentally, when the Gelman in the mid-90s justified the introduction of Russia's art space program strict censorship and repression, he argued that this draconian program is designed for a year, and then you can connect the mechanisms of self-regulation of the market. But we see that many years later, the project remained relevant to Gelman.
Another cross-cutting idea Gelman and his supporters (worms?) - An early collapse of centuries-old way of the art market because of improved technology of reproduction. In this connection I should like to quote here an excerpt from the article Yu Avtonomova "Looking at art through the lens of economic theory with the review of alternative views about the authenticity of works of art. But the article struck me as interesting in other respects, so I want it to offer a whole -
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...045#post305045)
Цитата:
Сообщение от Sergeyitch
This is what it was about? I think many do not know how I like. Who is it justified and how can this be accomplished?
|
Program under the characteristic title "What to do" was published by Gelman in 1998. It has been preserved in the archives of the Art Primer GiF.Ru.:
http://azbuka.gif.ru/important/guelman-chto-delat/ Fortunately, Marat did not have enough influence to full implementation of its proposed strategy.