Thanks for the answer . Signature seems to me just a very accurate handwriting and construction. Very often Cocteau signed only by the name and the "star" ( I brought pictures of his work ) , and if you look at the handwriting and the title is "J" and descending "n" look very similar .. I thought that it might not be a copy , and wannabe but what's the point then copy the exact signature Cocteau ? It seemed to me that the imitators usually make ambiguous signature , a similar but not exact , that they are not prizhuchit signature .. And it seems to me very accurately transmitted.
I also drew attention to this "Little Fawn " , but at the same time I found a listing dozens if not hundreds of different sketches in a series of "Faun " is so different that this work could well be one of this series . Just proguglit Pictures "Jean Cocteau Faun" - many variations ..
There is likely to question the stylistic analysis and the technique of drawing .. Actually I certainly understand that the photo is almost impossible to determine the authenticity of the picture, but rather the idea here is that if there is a possibility that this is the original , you can spend 300 euros for examination ( Cocteau in the center of Paris, I then 3 hours from Geneva ) , or if the experts can be seen with the naked eye , that is not the original , it makes no sense to pay for expertise in this issue .. )
|