Цитата:
Сообщение от voloviks
I did not expect from you such a superficial perception.
|
You must not angry with me, I try to because of their limited abilities, do not ask me too much!
Цитата:
Сообщение от voloviks
Puvis de Chavannes, of course, naive
|
No, Puvis de Chavannes was not naive, but on the contrary, very tserebralen (he has faithfully followed the theological direction of Saint-Sulpice, and in general theoretically justified all his works).
Цитата:
Сообщение от voloviks
opposition Bonnard and Vuillard meaningless. Maurice Denis theorist of the movement "Nabi" ( "prophets"), Gauguin and the Japanese passion for drawing was the basis of directions. Color Denis in Japanese refined, and singing from the same plastic lines. And in general to compare the artists is a thankless task and not reasonable. To love or not love - this is understandable, but to compare? Your comparison sometimes resemble paver.
|
Stop practicing casuistry, Doctor! "Do not compare artists" - is nothing more than a figure of style: it is precisely by comparing and determined taste preferences
I am grateful to you for what you reminded me that Denis was the theoretician of the movement "Nabi" (my memory is really not the same as going to the first page of this branch to see what I wrote there, I am lazy) but let me once again disagree with you: a comparison with Denis and Bonnard Vuillard was not meaningless - it's about a group of artists that includes a stylistic affinity, but in this case is just the most clearly identifies the personal qualities of each. I insist on the fact that creativity Bonnard and Vuillard immeasurably important than the products Denis.
P.S. You talk about Japanese prints, which influenced Denis (not only on him, at all Nabidov), the similarity of their colors. But do not forget that these prints - painted printed graphics small size, and Maurice Denis to make healthy oryasiny on which color looks quite different.
Here are my suggestions