Цитата:
Сообщение от abbakus
.... well, how can plow the sand ? and even in two similar themes in different sections of the forum ..
|
I do not agree with you. This topic is devoted to the subject - " Forgery Grigorieva ." Another topic is the personality Elena Basner . Your post is directed against the person Basner . That is probably why you are not interested in the topic and forgery. And we are very interesting ....
I agree that information until enough ....
Added after 37 minutes 5:00
And another :
Just read and advise a very good and a great article in Zolotonosov "City 812 " ( currently only available in printed form ) . All laid out on shelves . Quite objectively. It has a new promise for me - " consequence would like to check the authenticity of the independent examination of the Russian Museum ." It is not clear where there are " independent experts ."
Interesting website on different versions of the causes and consequences . I advise ...
*******************************
I have a feeling that I was late - too late discovered this forum . Subject became exhausted and not interested ...
I can throw in some firewood ?
Why nobody notes that fake Vasilyeva, original from the Russian Museum and the picture of the magazine is completely different Burceva not like the paintings themselves ? This is not a " copy " is not a " clone " is not " as two drops of water " ... The only thing that unites them is a common theme , composition, basic color ratio (for the first two ) . They are categorically different.
This is the first .
Second . A very important idea - if the forger Vasilievka pictures I was ( chur - chur me) I would have brought Vasilyev (via Basner - SHumakova ) not Vasilevsky composition , and would create an absolutely precise composition and all-all Circuits Journal Burceva . After all, only photographic Burtsevskaya is 100%proven Grigoryevskaya original song! It's easy! Was it not a bingo ? Why invent something of their own , not on what does not like ?
Or am I wrong somewhere and error in my reasoning ?
Lord , well, right?