Listen gentlemen, well, how can plow the sand ? and even in two similar themes in different sections of the forum .
Can understand nothing in painting, art market, and after reading all that is written in this thread, do enough objective conclusions about this story.
First, such a story would not be inflated if the "main accused" was not just innocent intermediary or expert entitled to a mistake. Fraud - the main accusation . and rather obvious - it is fair. Next , all seen on time, the entire story was originally embedded specifically for a specific buyer . Too many lines coincide , too obvious and subtle approach catching " live bait " , all details of the specific forgery , its "history " and " provenance " were well thought out to exactly Vasiliev bought it .
Further. the reputation of the " defendant " is not crystal, read this topic . references to old stories to other counterfeits sold to different opinion of market participants about the man. little what? You can continue , but I think you should just wait . will continue to be only bigger.
|