Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 12.02.2014, 15:11 Язык оригинала: Русский       #7
Гуру
 
Аватар для тата
 
Регистрация: 07.12.2008
Адрес: Москва
Сообщений: 1,576
Спасибо: 841
Поблагодарили 1,005 раз(а) в 434 сообщениях
Репутация: 2005
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Adulter_com Посмотреть сообщение
French law more " prdvinuto " in this sense, and if it is detected , regardless of the initial agreement is a significant difference at resale " bought out " antique item , the original owner has the right to receive or lost profits , or to return the object, . as for us , if there is no legal rule this continue to thrive " etudes in shades of gray " and the introduction of such a rule "the market " would be very banked .
 Significant difference - it does not figure . And in our legislation more
 particular there is a concept - a conscious misrepresentation , only
 apply it practically impossible . You see, the same buyer
 may err on the basis of price and at the expense of authenticity.
 In my practice, I have given more than the real thing could be for example,
 liked the work , and it did not sell . Can I count on the difference
 for example, under French law . <! - ~ 1 ~ ->
__________________
Моя коллекция: http://tramvaiiskusstv.ru/




Последний раз редактировалось тата; 12.02.2014 в 15:17.
тата вне форума   Ответить с цитированием