Тема: New realism, USA
Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 01.04.2009, 08:30 Язык оригинала: Русский       #45
Гуру
 
Аватар для Pavel
 
Регистрация: 13.02.2009
Сообщений: 7,384
Спасибо: 3,976
Поблагодарили 4,028 раз(а) в 1,687 сообщениях
Репутация: -2
По умолчанию

I have not cleaned.
I am for equality. And you?
Madame! The artist should be able to analyze their own and others' work. Criticizing can kazhdyy.Kritika implies a certain superiority of the critic, who does not have the artist, which should be done, but is constantly questioned. Actually it would be luchshe all, if artists who are able but do not know, worked on the instructions of critics, who, thank God, they know, but do not know how.
I am not criticizing the Paris School.


[color="# 666686"]Added after 3 minutes[/color]
Цитата:
Сообщение от OlgaV Посмотреть сообщение
Dear Paul!
The works of Freud, I have known a long time and in the original, so things will come. You do not Lucien Freud? But your work, I have not seen, which is why your criticism in many themes evoke mistrust.
Let us agree, at first your work, and then critique other artists, trends and schools (especially Paris).
Once again I am not criticizing, I try to understand.
I would be happy to do an exhibition at the Getty Center.



Pavel вне форума   Ответить с цитированием