[Магнолия]

Сообщение от K-Maler; 2932381"

Behind the scenes , the system returns .

Do not think that this system of payment of bribes in - action?

Сообщение от iside; 2930731"

is more vivid anti- culture, but on the official site , I find that the witness be a regression of any , and especially cultural - very sad.

It seems that due to the stratification of society on the principle " tsifropolzovateley " and others, as well as the prospect of all kinds of deficits (energy , natur.produkty , quality of goods and services ... ) the idea of mass debilizatsii population. So-called advanced themselves to find ways to the requested levels of culture, and the implementation of mental debilitation mandated comprehensive school and television. Macroprocesses as macroeconomics, differ significantly from the perceived normal psyche, they are not clear , and therefore are subject to negative ratings.
I do not express any "yes" or "no." I just watch and try to understand what is happening .

By the way, in the diaries appeared difficult , relatively influential , opinion.
Copy in case you will be removed .

" Economy of Culture ( January abstracts ) Record Gelman posted 06/01/2014 at 15:58
I am getting ready to report the Gaidar Forum . The theme of " economy of culture."
17 do not try to touch the personalities and generally only focus on economic issues. And while the public for discussion and criticism of plan performance.

1. What we observe , what type can be seen with the naked eye

- Economy service free time
- the city's economy
- Art Market
- The formation and preservation of cultural heritage - cultural capital and dividends , tourism
- A growing share in the creative economy , non-technological innovation.
- Art as a tool ( territorial marketing , urban studies , education , economics of education , international relations , international integration )

And then will be the most interesting.

Читать дальше... 

Figures . It turns out more than twice in the world such as agriculture. Well and left us to understand how to approach this .


2 . We are all happy to comment on the ministry's idiotic initiatives in artistic policy. But imagine that instead of Medina would be more sane people in the cultural sense .
Does this mean that there would immediately correct cultural policy ? Do the Ministry of Culture in the government and wider modern humans , systemic thinking , understanding the new role of culture and much narrower active power in this sphere . Where it operates, who contributes , as it creates the conditions and negotiates what ?


3 . what we have

3.1. Economical policy of the state in the field of culture ( cultural institutions - the burden , the cultural sphere - the social sphere , the distribution of funds through the State order )

3.2 Soviet legacy - a suitcase without a handle and not upgradeable infrastructure . Management case is the most archaic and conservative. Virtually the entire budget is spent on infrastructure which has lost the old functionality (except for conservation) and is not looking for a new one.

3.3. Departmental approach . ( Disclaimer competition off of contemporary art process , loss of communication with the audience. Loss of old and new. Inability assess the effectiveness of any move )

3.4. Challenges of our time : the Internet, post-industrial economy , freedom of movement , cultural globalization (which because of the weakness of our institutions looks like intervention )

3.5 shoots of the new economy ( publishers, independent producers , collectors , the author as an entrepreneur in the humanitarian field

3.6. The emergence of a new customer ( urban studies , the trend in the formation of public places )

3.7 insanity power ( trying to formulate the goals are not shared by the creative community . )


4 . what to do

- Decentralization . Transition from relations center - regions . To many of the network centers. Changing strategic partner. Not Fed and the city authorities . City acts territory contributes , the federation creates conditions .

- The rejection of a single strategy . ( Well, can not be one goal of the artist critic municipality officials and policies) Everyone has their own strategy which combine not unity of purpose and the social contract . Mutual benefit . The transition to the strategic space. Competition policies as an incentive to the development of territories.

- Clear separation of art and cultural policy . Narrative policy prerogative art institution . Cultural policy initiated power - is implemented by all SUBJECT . Formation of real public institutions in the field of culture, not clownish , such as meeting Tolstoevskogo heirs .

- Refusal of departmental approach . Restriction of the Ministry of Culture . Adoption of a package of laws for the economic development of culture. Changing proportions of the national budget in the direction of increasing municipal budgets. Replacing the state order for stimulation. Interbudget , coherent funding where culture acts as a tool.

- Moving the tools of modernization in technology in the humanities ( startups , innovation centers , coworking ) .


CALL
The Russian economy has lost every battle for univrsalnoe ( aypadov machine and etc ) may instead skolkovo RUSNANO and using art to begin development of the market of the future - to engage in unique ? "