Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 26.12.2013, 01:09 Язык оригинала: Русский       #17
Авторитет
 
Регистрация: 05.07.2008
Сообщений: 965
Спасибо: 924
Поблагодарили 1,263 раз(а) в 340 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 1
Репутация: 2028
По умолчанию

Cyril Syzransky, I agree with you, but, in my opinion, it's nothing to what I have said does not change.

Added after 12 minutes
Peter, yes, I agree , there are two options . One - reliable , but not particularly lucrative . The second high - risky , but a lot of promises . It all depends on choosing psycho . I always choose the second option. Of course , given that this is still not a roulette . Very much depends on my ( promoter ) qualification. And because the chances are not so small. Especially if advance professionally assess the risks ( I wrote an article about their assessment , ie, G -promoted artist criteria ) .
The second paragraph completely disagree. In this article I write about the necessary sensuality one artist and promoter. If they are, then the long joint cooperation is very likely

Added after 16 minutes
Mikhalych, absolutely subscribe . I practice is similar. And in general I'm not very interested in the established collectors . Their soul is already occupied . As wall <! - 1 ~ ~ -> . I very interesting form of consumption environment . In this case, a modest scale need not thousands, but only tens involved . But their <! - ~ 1 ~ ->




Последний раз редактировалось iosif; 26.12.2013 в 01:25. Причина: Добавлено сообщение
iosif вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 2 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо iosif за это полезное сообщение:
Peter (26.12.2013), Seriy (26.12.2013)