[Магнолия]

In connection with the Ukrainian events useful to hear :
" Following other conservatives criticized Tikhomirov " right " liberal political system and the revolutionary movement , noting that" the party leaders get some peculiar value of sovereign princes , or , more precisely, the oligarchs. Main official government pales in comparison to these unspoken masters , creating and subvert the government official . " but with all the seeming power of democracy , according to Tikhomirov , generates extremely unauthoritative layer of managers ' patrician nobility, servitors mass sometimes hated , but respected and feared . contemporary politicians - just despise wherever democratic system as something appreciated "because the ruling class " forever busy fighting for power, constantly forced to think about how to capture people , disrupt his voice, hook - crook to drag him to her, and not himself come to him ... No class living is more people than the current politicians . " apotheosis of deception, in terms of Tikhomirov , elections are " pieces of art to fool the crowd, flatter her , threaten to enthrall her - on the part of that deadly , poisonous propaganda art business people will always be beaten by those who devoted himself specially politicking . " Parliamentary will exist until " until finally disappear under the pressure of non-public contempt , has long reached full maturity and movement still appears to be impossible by the absence of personality around which it could link up . " Under this movement Tikhomirov understand socialism. "
 Tikhomirov recognized pattern of socialism as a protest against the operation , noting that under the guise of words on arguments about freedom and equality , of the bourgeois of practice has led to the domination of the capitalist over the proletariat deprived of basic rights , but " on the basis of extreme poverty and - too often - direct harassment were bound to arise revolutionary movement of the masses , in theory declared masters of the state, but in practice very often slaves of felt . " In socialist doctrine Tikhomirov seen not only purely economic motives , but a spontaneous protest against the mass impoverishment legitimate desire of people to improve their lives . Not accidentally , he argued that the state should take care of its citizens , wondering : " ... what is the position of the person if the earnings and allows to live somehow , but does not provide any security? Lost his job - and immediately found myself in the position of stray street dogs , if not the worst , "and believed that socialism " ... absolutely right , appealing in this case is not a simple philanthropy , and arguing that on of an obligation to take measures to change this situation . "