It seems to me, Meister rights that now turns out that de Stael huge potential.
I will particularly dwell on the fact that in my opinion, this is one of the greatest artists of the 20 th century, but 10 years ago it was thought that he was already very expensive. Works on the market came out very little, and they generally cost several orders of magnitude higher than that of its counterparts in the Second School of Paris (Polyakov, Lanskoy, etc.) - quite deservedly.
But now it turns out that this breakneck growth of the market it is practically not affected. It seems that Russian buyers ignore it, which is also clear - much more advantageous to untwist Lansky, whose work is not hard to find, or even pull artists out of nothingness (Baranov-Rossine, and now Shapoval) - itself a remarkable phenomenon, and is welded to the mediators more .
However, when collecting art collection mid-20 th century or even the art of the 20 th century as a whole, we can dispense with the names that I listed in the preceding paragraph, then without de Stael, this collection will be flawed.
|