in my opinion , the old man , not playing , remaining himself , beat state to the nines .
Seizing of the state hoped that the old run to the lawyers.
It was understood that the old man , through his lawyers at his own expense , will begin to prove that his work is clean and fluffy .
The state, as judges famously play in gambit and for others to carve himself whatever he wants on the cake.
But the opposite happened , the old did not run to lawyers and taking advantage of the presumption of innocence , provided all the information to the state for help .
This is one reason why so long does the analysis work , the state has no staff and money for it , and most importantly , responsibility for information issued on the mountain lies entirely on the state.
And it is quite a different alignment .
My opinion is to cooperate with the state, it will not be of personal, moral reasons .
Opinion is based on a pair of old sayings . The first type of guys, what this circus , I'm 80 years old, a couple of years left , and so all went to you.
The second type as possible to cooperate with those who in spite of their same laws as buying stolen goods byryga . ( State was meant buying in Switzerland drives stolen bank data German depositors)
|