[Кирилл Сызранский]

M. Gelman :

I do not agree , of course. It is very important to have artists who see themselves in a social context , it is very important that radical artists . God forbid, all artistic sphere will think themselves politically or herself to think radically . In this sense, Kashlyakov , and Brodsky , late Osmolovsky , they are also within the art world , sometimes they are interested in broader issues than momentary policy . A second very important - the fact that we have a policy disappeared.

You can say that when there is one politician - Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin , then the whole I think - it's a bad performance . Do not share. Because the action - it's all the same thing. And there is pure gesture. Therefore, it is the artists today - not only Peter and Peter - have shown that there is no policy . Because artistic gesture looks much more politic than meeting our thoughts than the chairpersons of the government. Tolia said about this ambiguity - an ironic and tragic . I want to say - weakness. Usually aktsionist a position of strength : we will block the move, we will call for a fight ...

 And here is what you do to me can not do anything , it's purely a Christian model . How to beat the strong man? He will hit you on the right cheek - substitute the left . Where can you kill another , for what kind of eggs you can catch a man who calls himself ... This is a very important warning our government: your power comes to an end at a time when a man in despair, demonstrating the limits of what you can do with it , yourself. In this sense, this action is , of course, Politic action , not only in the message of this - a police state , and so on, and it showed , demonstrated the limits of possibility . It does not matter , you're Putin , you have an army , you all think you have a lot of prisons - nothing you can do to a man who himself nailed to the area .