Тема: Records Christie's
Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 15.11.2013, 00:08 Язык оригинала: Русский       #35
Гуру
 
Аватар для zarajara
 
Регистрация: 19.11.2010
Адрес: Ереван
Сообщений: 1,955
Спасибо: 6,604
Поблагодарили 5,060 раз(а) в 1,378 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 33
Репутация: 10186
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Cyril Syzran Посмотреть сообщение
Good Rubens in museums, market things tend to his studio .
I like a bit of it. Prices this level , it is not the price of /for art . This is a pure abstraction . It's as if a picture was worth $ 1 - it's not its price , just a figure . Because in fact there is no reason not to , or for the other.
Well, let's not Rubens , and the same Goncharova, for 6 million as I can remember . 20 times better?
Seriy, genius , talent, yes please , you just announcing now very very abstract and theoretical concepts that are not directly transferred to the cost , especially in this price .
Warhol urinated on canvas - it's worth 10 million because he is a genius ?
It seems to me that this kind of game, which is already in itself almost without depending on the object. Rather there is a number of objects that are suitable to all believe that the game is going on around them.
But it is rather closer to the fetishism than money laundering , IMHO, then look in vain for the rational .




Последний раз редактировалось zarajara; 15.11.2013 в 00:13.
zarajara вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 2 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо zarajara за это полезное сообщение:
kron (18.12.2017), Аркадий (15.11.2013)