25.03.2009, 15:10
|
Язык оригинала: Русский
#40
|
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 27.08.2008
Адрес: Москва-Шуши.
Сообщений: 4,525
Спасибо: 4,922
Поблагодарили 5,759 раз(а) в 1,470 сообщениях
Репутация: 10306
|
Цитата:
Сообщение от Meister
It is important that there is nothing more than to bring these works can not. Here the quality of the picture depends on the skill of the artist and his ability to draw people, animals, buildings and flowers. From this point of view, Rembrandt, Cranach, Breughel, of course, have no equal. But the idea of something in principle is always the same: the image situation. You can admire prorisovannostyu, skill transfer colors, images, etc., but nothing more then
|
Here I would agree to the above. I think that the artist should be different, the more it varies, the higher his vision and m e. Such artists as Shishkin, Ayvazavsky, they are too monotonous, and naturally uninteresting.
|
|
|