Цитата:
Сообщение от LCR
Of course, Filonov - (incidentally, in my opinion, not the most dazzling genius 20 at.) Weaker than the Rembrandt.
Suprematism of Malevich, Kandinsky's abstraction and avant-garde in the early 20. - This, indisputably, the quality, but compare them to Rembrandt and Velasquez too humiliating for the avant-garde, as Rembrandt and Velasquez (and others), it is second - first and foremost on the quality of painting, but also the strength of spirit, too. You should have compared them with Dali: p
|
In my opinion, this is too categorical statement, since the Wizards listed belong to disjoint sets, it's totally different, disparate material.
Meister is absolutely right that the twentieth century has given so many new ideas, how many did not give the entire previous history. This is understandable: before the twentieth century was a mapping mission of the artist's reality, and a measure of skill of the artist was a "similarity", which is why many geniuses, departing from the accepted canon, and have not been too successful in life. In the twentieth century with the invention of non-figurative art and the slogan "art for art's sake" everything changed, and the first half-century gave rise to the Masters, making art is not for sale, which distinguishes them from all previous generations.
Цитата:
Сообщение от Art-lover
Innovation, enthusiasm of the pioneers - demiurges new universes, the attempts of creativity, based on the belief in direct occult mission of art - this is what is interesting and significant avant-garde. But the tension of spirit and a brave experiment are not equivalent to a depth of spirit. Alas.
|
Here is a good idea to define the term "depth of spirit." Known history, when the exams VGIK Tarkovsky and Shukshin was asked the same question: "How do you feel about" War and Peace "Tolstoy?". One replied that it was - the top of the literature, the second said that for him this novel is comparable with brick, only the latter is more useful on the farm. And who are more spiritual?
I have this so that everyone their world: to me Filonov, of course, higher the Rembrandt, but I totally understand the position of those who believe the contrary, it depends on the internal tuning fork, at which wave it is configured.