Well, found one. But all this is very strange: the picture was placed on Ebay in the U.S., a preliminary assessment of 2000-3000 dollars, sold for $ 2000 - these prices long gone, but it does not matter, everything happens.
I turn now to what disturbs me: the work was signed in French, but the back of the canvas - prints the Ministry of Culture, permitting it to export, that is, in principle, this should have meant that the film was written before our departure in 1978 . and in any case not later than 1993 is true?
Print looks quite new, it is extremely clear, and - I compared with printing on one of the works that we were taken, - it is not handwritten or price fee, no date, in general, it does not print, and Filkin charter.
Now the main thing - style. Frankly, I do not remember this picture, although in principle know all of my husband.
In general, one has to choose only between the work 60-ies. and the works of the last period 1995-2003.
Character in the foreground may recall Nishina of 1961-64 gg., Or shall we say: These front-end figure, quite detailed, is not typical for the last period, and 62-64 years. they occur.
But the landscape is fairly typical for pictures of the last decade, the contours of the early works harder, they graphically (I've put a picture for comparison).
In general, the puzzle. It is absolutely impossible that this work bvla written in 60-ies. (French signature!), then the whole story with the press - just sell.
I admit that this work is 96-98 years. But that co-it confuses me.
So I do not know what to do. Until now, to me 2 times treated with paintings Roginsky me to confirm the authenticity, but both times they completely resemble Roginsky, so I gave the answer with a clear conscience - indeed, they were not fakes, but just something to work who tried to pass off as Roginsky.
The current case - svsem another matter, I'm at a loss and look forward to your advice
I spread here:
1 - ad on Ebay
2 - close-up pictures
3 - Signature
4 - flip side of
5 - close-up printing