Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 23.03.2009, 15:14 Язык оригинала: Русский       #19
Гуру
 
Аватар для Meister
 
Регистрация: 11.04.2008
Адрес: Москва
Сообщений: 2,576
Спасибо: 1,512
Поблагодарили 2,998 раз(а) в 1,037 сообщениях
Репутация: 1816
Отправить сообщение для Meister с помощью ICQ
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от LCR Посмотреть сообщение
The Byzantine and Romanesque art in the same way as an obligation of Greece and Rome, in which the art of the Renaissance must romance and Byzantine art (yes, the continuity of communication with Greece, the Renaissance and the rhythm is written much, but enough to look of Ravenskie mosaic, to make sure that the connection of this art from the Byzantine Empire was no less strong, the influence of Romanesque art, and say nothing).
continuity is present everywhere. It can not take something out of nowhere, must necessarily be based. Its size and extent of borrowing - is another matter. Something more impact, something less.


Цитата:
Сообщение от LCR Посмотреть сообщение
In these periods appear not less than the great masters. Another thing is that their names did not reach us, for various reasons, not the most recent of which - that the Middle Ages did not practice the cult of the name ( "work without the artist's" - now, on the contrary, "the artist without works, for example, Duchamp, but not he alone)
Ok, well call me then at least a dozen is between mid 17 and mid-19?


Цитата:
Сообщение от LCR Посмотреть сообщение
Well, firstly, because for me, and not only for me, almost half of these names should be disposed

Secondly, from left, who can be compare with Tami as quoted by you Rembrandt or Titian? The recent exhibition "Picasso and the old masters" demonstrated feebleness Picasso in comparison with some of El Greco.
даааа?? or you can specify what names to throw?
Who compared to Rembrandt? Malevich, Kandinsky, Filonov, Gauguin, Van Gogh ... I was shocked they are not less, and sometimes much more ...


Цитата:
Сообщение от LCR Посмотреть сообщение
Impressionism, expressionism, etc. - No more than words: the artists were good and not so good. For example, in cubism per Gris has a dozen Metzinger. But in general, if we talk about a painting, I am deeply convinced that 17 century to organic one example, far exceeds the 20 th.
Have always been both good and bad artists. At the same Titian had 1000, and even two very mediocre artists.
But in terms of innovation and depth of ideas, the 20 th century, I am sure, on both blades puts 15-17.
__________________
До меня мир рисовали таким, как его видят. Я рисую так, как его мыслю. (с) Пикассо.



Meister вне форума   Ответить с цитированием