Цитата:
Сообщение от LCR
All these popytkm "wake up" the taste anesthetized lead to a denial of the value of the most important periods in the history of art. In the field of art the concept of progress is meaningless. After the fall of the Roman Empire regression art is incredible. And what is interesting: the people who praise the contemporary art, has always stressed his love for the primitive arts. But if art is in continuous progress, that primitive art should be at the lowest level in the hierarchy, and the place of the Greco-Roman sculpture will not be much higher ...
|
frankly, I'm not sure that these people are familiar with the forms of primitive art, though as with the history of art in general. Frankly, after the fall of the Roman Empire, the art of the century to 15-16 barely evolved, and then have soared after the opening of The Da Vinci oil painting - it gave the foundation for the transition possibilities of art to a new level .. but after Raphael, Mikellandzhelo, Titian and masters Flemish and Dutch school again for a few centuries the art of almost stood still and nothing revolutionary new until the middle of 19 th century virtually created ... the end of 19 and another 70-80 years of the twentieth century, ie almost century, was a fantastic leap in the development of art, it is not simply shifted to a new step, and ran a few sorties. In my opinion, such a revolutionary leap in general has never hitherto in the history of art was not. Now, it "goes flat and the rest after the rapid development and can be decades, century, several centuries may be stagnant on the results of the 20 th century, until a chance to reach the next level, which will be linked, I believe, to scientific progress and new technical possibilities. And yet still enjoy what is already established and not try to justify the contemporary art ...