Цитата:
Сообщение от bykinist
And what is it that you have placed about the " new" in Mexico ?
|
Love Gurevich written article undoubtedly useful and talented , but extremely vicious . The main point of the article: Timur Novikov had the audacity to be successful and get the money , not even being an artist and art historian without education by total falsification of art.
Sure, Timur Novikov did not deserve to imagine such a relationship. As to the period of his creative activity, when he was a member of the "New Artists ", and the lead , I specifically cited the example above of the exhibition catalog , 1991 in Mexico City Museum of Contemporary Art. And a real exhibition , which took place in reality , not on paper, and the directory is not adulterated , circulation 2,000 copies in all - still can be verified. And the list of members is clearly not organized alphabetically , proves that Novikov do not always know how to " exploit the situation for their own purposes and " feel the demiurge , " there were more nimble counterparts - the catalog opens first S. Bugaev .
As for the apparent falsification of documents submitted to various directories on the HX , these falsifications not just lie on the surface and catch the eye of any careful reader of these directories , and not just " Pageturner ." They are many , here are just two examples. In the catalog of the Russian Museum " Brushstroke " in 2010 on page 300 in the list of exhibitions, which took HX, it says: "New Artists" in 1983 Kuzneckiy 17 Moscow . Of course , not all Muscovites do not know at this address if there is a historical building of the former monastery of Tver , but all a bit familiar with the history of NC is well known that the first NH exhibited in Moscow House of Artists in the Kuznetsk bridge , 11 only in 1986 youth on the 17th exhibition , being invited back through the exhibition TEII at which they actually noticed. That is so blatantly distorted the years from 1986 to 1983 . But not Novikov in 2010 influenced the drafters of this directory. Another example , if one takes the trouble to look into the documents are not readable in the exhibition catalog scandalous "Assa . The latest generation of the Leningrad avant-garde " , then they can be seen without a magnifying glass as famously in the dates of the hand of the figures forwarded years so that the latter was the number 2 . I even found one among them , which have not yet managed to smuggle , appears creation date of 1984 , although the name of the group is clearly reprinted again, because earlier in 1984 they called themselves The new painters, and sometimes Engineers and the New Art . Status is New Artists took shape only in 1986 so that by the falsification of documents and " create labels " is still unknown who made and continues to put a hand , at least , is not exactly one Timur Petrovich , but apparently some special interest in the substitution of a member of dates former NH group and \\\\ or collectors and art historians serving them .