Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 23.09.2013, 08:17 Язык оригинала: Русский       #268
Гуру
 
Аватар для Pavel
 
Регистрация: 13.02.2009
Сообщений: 7,384
Спасибо: 3,976
Поблагодарили 4,028 раз(а) в 1,687 сообщениях
Репутация: -2
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Maskit Посмотреть сообщение
Pavel, when Picasso and Matisse paid their drawings public opinion was already familiar with these names . And then the concept of pay rather rubber . I also can and often cry at the exhibitions of children with disabilities, type , Children of Mary , and so on. for the children's drawings and sculptures by no means suggesting to consider them as an investment in the arts .
Well Matisse paintings did not pay , it's Picasso, but the conversation is old and Matisse spoke about this when he was criticized for the fact that he holds a picture of the bank.
When a canvas smeared with paint is one thing, but when the hand of genius , it is worth millions , then what is it ?



Pavel вне форума   Ответить с цитированием