Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 04.09.2013, 08:34 Язык оригинала: Русский       #3535
Гуру
 
Регистрация: 15.09.2009
Адрес: Киев
Сообщений: 3,066
Спасибо: 385
Поблагодарили 3,134 раз(а) в 1,448 сообщениях
Репутация: 6243
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Seriy; 2744231 "
from the point of view of investment, as it turned out , it was possible to buy anything from contemporary artists .
Do not remind any of the contemporary artists in question.
I remember selling Brookman and Bakhchanian . For a few thousand dollars.
About the current sales Brookman is not known, but Bahchanyan 30 years prior to the auction emigrated to the United States, not somehow fit on the topic. Yes, and the last sale was for him in 1300 , but not for 3000-4000 , as proposed then for computer printing.

Can not find anything in the official sales Bruni Lawrence .

Then , basically, Gelos sold fairly well-known artists , who in 60 years .
Kabakov is difficult to attribute or Infante to the "modern" artists which says Eugene .

Alain looked Kirtsova estimated at 5-6 thousand only then to sell fixed - Artinvestment 6000 euros. At times just did not increase .

Interestingly by Michael Odnoralov - assessment then 4000 . Then only the 2nd sale- 3600, and almost the same still life , as in Gelos , after 5 years at MacDougall `s- 5200 .
With protsenami auctions , trade Navara from eggs .

That is, proposal to fight inflation purchase of modern artists safely even at prices not to mention the liquidity - try if you want to get rid of .
In my opinion, " from the point of view of investment," then you can buy whatever you want. The financial bubble was at the beginning. And these artists do not exactly what " successful " acquisition .



Fed вне форума   Ответить с цитированием