LCR, I never, and never claimed that Rothko - a bad artist. Moreover, in my opinion, he has developed some very good ideas Matyushina. But the oil (or the temperature, which is more common) Matyushina today is, say, 400 000, well, the best things - 1 000 000, and Rothko - 70 000 000. That's what is wrong. Matyushin - one of the most important people in the history of art, and Rothko - one of the. In my opinion, a fair price for the Rothko must be at the level of Vasarely, Lansky - ie 150 000 - 300 000, everything above - the foam from the promotion. And he is a good artist
.
[color="# 666686"]Posted 2 hours 38 minutes[/color]
Цитата:
Сообщение от Vladimir
A lot of it is known in the history of examples of people who have bought works by artists that are included in the monograph, had numerous publications, exhibitions, etc. zanchitelnye would remain with distressed canvas? Let us concretize:
1. Can depreciate Neo Rauch? And that for this to happen?
2. What examples from history can attest to the risks of depreciation for all? Temporary "drawdown" - does not figure too Impressionists subside.
|
Deb-Ponsan, Forain, Rops, GIS, Viyett, Guillaume, Legrand, Riviera, Blois, Jouy, Donna, Debuten, de Chavannes, Ranson, Vyuyyar, Roussel, Muller, DETAILS, Enner, Ziem, Fanta, Darda, Lautier, Morin - it is the artists, which doctor Vollar, the most famous Marshal, in the history of art, the organizer of the first Impressionist exhibition and Cubists, called in his time the most important and promising. In the early twentieth century, they sold much better than Cezanne, Monet, Degas.
Another example. I began to buy paintings in the late eighties. My first Purchace were works by Alexander Parkhomenko and Eugene licorice. These people have had solo exhibitions in the CHA, it was a lot of publications, for their work frantically traded at auctions. I was lucky at the auction and buy some of their works to 10 000 rubles. Then that was big money, for example, Lada cost about 7000. Can you now say anything about any artist mentioned? This is the answer to your second question.
The first question is simple. It may well be that prominent gallery owners, for some reason begin to engage in other names, but without the active participation of the audience forget Neo Rauch in a very short time. Indeed, he did not Bacon and Tanguy, but only - one.