Frosechka, the depth of the coming correction can only conjecture ..
Even the casual researcher of the history of world art can tell about the collapse of Soho in the early 90's - the stars of world art, Julian Schnabel, Sandro Kia and Enzo Kuchchi not find a buyer, the legions of the most prestigious galleries finally closed its doors, general sense of despair and fear gripped the entire quarter. In 1993, critic for The New York Times NR Kleynfild analyzed the level of desperation dealers Soho. Bargaining, as if he bought a used car, every time he gets 20%discount - such discounts now available only to very large collectors and museums. In the gallery of Leo Castelli, he was offered 270,000 dollars for Lichtenstein sculpture, a year ago has cost $ 400,000.
It says skadke in 20%, but 270,000 for the sculpture, which cost 400000, I think that this is not 20%, and more than 30%.
We must also see whether there were customers who take these things on the proposed prices, or better said, how many of these buyers?
Mademuazell Art,
if this were possible, such ratings would not have existed, although I do not quite agree with the wording "ranking of the best artists," better to talk about "rankings of the most expensive art", otherwise we obtain a somewhat strange: within 3 months of X considered the best, and then Y to move it to second place "for goodness" - but not for long, because at the next auction of the work of X sold more than the work of Y. and again begins mess!
One can assume that for unwinding at this level need very substantial funding and, more importantly, different social status.
Volodya: a priori, I would say that the precedents. Names that come to mind first of all, it Meissonier, Fortuny, that is, more or less the official painting of the second half of the 19 th century.
But it is too easy an answer, it would be interesting to see, not worthless if many works of old art, I'm talking about the artists of the Renaissance and the Baroque. Prices of many paintings are known, but statistics on the "housewife's shopping basket" at the time was carried out (and sorry, right? Though this is the basket - is also quite a scam), so it's hard to imagine what those prices are consistent with, for example, up to 19 century in England the price of the bed is almost equal to the price of farmhouse - surprisingly, no?
Цитата:
Сообщение от qwerty
Actually, I share your views and opinions of LCR on this artist. Judge for yourself, in principle, nothing new in his work there: ugly human figures in the thirties, forties, a large number of Germans were doing, in particular Grosh and Grundig. /.../I think that this is the same story as with Rothko: You can always find some very wealthy Pinocchio, not too versed in the subject, and convince them that they face painting brilliant genius, which in future will be even genius. In this case, a small amount of work suddenly becomes a plus: this no one, well, in general, Shanghai leopards. In general, I would recommend stvl forumcanam invested in by this artist.
|
Not to mention Velasquez with his freaks
Calling it "the Shanghai bars" you have shown exceptional generosity, sir, I would remember any other fur-bearing animals, Mexican badger
Another thing: at the Rothko I'm with you (with a small letter, as you, sinners, several!) Does not agree, I like it very much!
And finally: somewhere I read that the prices on contemporary art
always too high compared with the old. But by definition, at some point it ceases to be modern, it is necessary to observe what is happening on that fateful day: p