Seriy, here you are again pretending that you do not understand.
At school you can learn only one - figure. Rather, the pattern can be learned most, but it will take some time. Everything else is being taught - a set of stereotypes, rules that are someone else's subjective. Undoubtedly, there are rules, without which nowhere - for example the prospect, the proportions of the human face and body. This way, you can also learn how to, once again, at a cost of more time than the self. And sometimes just enough "to get the hand."
Also, in my opinion, schooling provides the only plus - writing articles that do not exist in reality with some accuracy the form. That is, paint a picture not from nature.
You are right, painting - the language. Implementation of the above-described rules will result in a more appropriate display of the form. Still life, portrait, landscape undoubtedly require these codes. But there are plenty of examples where this is not required.
Of course, I believe that a lot of lost because I do not studied. But instead I have something that gives me the urge to write and create. Of course, if it were possible - would have learned the pattern, there is no dispute can not be. But yet the lack of training has advantages, which in my opinion is not enough. When the "less is more", too bad.
manna, God grant that all was as it is what you came from. <! - ~ 1 ~ ->
|