Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 26.08.2013, 00:05 Язык оригинала: Русский       #45
Пользователь
 
Регистрация: 22.12.2009
Сообщений: 68
Спасибо: 13
Поблагодарили 111 раз(а) в 36 сообщениях
Репутация: 222
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Balagur Посмотреть сообщение
Can we then about poetry ( God forbid ) talk ?
I absolutely agree , and then have to remember Erich Gollerbakh opinion of a futuristic poetry ( " Page delirium " , 1940) :
" In the history of Russian literature, there is a page of delirium : creative futurists in the prewar years (followed by inglorious relapse in the first years after the October Revolution .) What is left of this page, half-erased ? Early Mayakovsky ( blanket ) , wild Khlebnikov ( with reservations) - and only .
Try as Benedikt Livshits , in his " Polutoraglazom Sagittarius " glorify this era, it is still a deeply decadent , wretched and miserable "
And this opinion is not accidental spiteful critics , and the author of two books about the " father of Russian Futurism " David Burliuk , written , by the way , at the personal request of the research object .
And now propose to replace " literature " by " painting " , Mayakovsky to Goncharova ( or Filonov ), and Khlebnikov on Rozanov . I think that the meaning of what Gollerbakh will not change .



Michael100 вне форума   Ответить с цитированием