Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 18.03.2009, 23:53 Язык оригинала: Русский       #5
Гуру
 
Аватар для K-Maler
 
Регистрация: 02.02.2009
Сообщений: 4,627
Спасибо: 9,570
Поблагодарили 3,691 раз(а) в 1,700 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 4
Репутация: 6499
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Sima Посмотреть сообщение
Default
Meister, of my long practice - the rules were not any. Worked on the rules established by the museum director's order. Maybe the price list of services - re-take. photocopying of documents, selection of officers, etc., ie "overhead" - this should also be establishing a document - the order of the director. But this is not for self use - it installed with the ceiling price, depending on circumstances. I was always in such cases, disturbed, which may be a legal successor, and that the law may be long sold by the artist himself, or successors of any foreign office human. For example, in Figure Goncharova were signs indicating that the rights transferred. Also faced with the fact that the import catalogs (museum exhibitions) on the work of other museums raised a copyright office.

But no one in the museum are not embarrassed. Nobody never claims were filed, even living artists. Be
Цитата:
Сообщение от Sima Посмотреть сообщение
d ' "use" - this is an article of income, extra-budgetary funds, ie remained in the museum at the prize. But now, my heart can feel something is changing. So I also wonder what answer
This is the law of copyright. 70 years after the death of the author's permission to publish his works are not required, it is considered a national treasure. But the practical issues, of course, relate to the cost ...



K-Maler вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо K-Maler за это полезное сообщение:
Meister (19.03.2009)