Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 19.08.2013, 10:29 Язык оригинала: Русский       #3077
Мастер графредактора
 
Регистрация: 19.02.2012
Сообщений: 2,098
Спасибо: 2
Поблагодарили 869 раз(а) в 720 сообщениях
Репутация: 1738
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Pavel Посмотреть сообщение
This is not compatible. There is art is the art of commerce. There is an art to find the art in a huge number of all. For this, and get the money Gader and collectors.
I would say the most nimble.
Well, as the Chinese, the Chinese. That's how much povtoryateley and reproducers with oleography?
Yes, the art of commerce. The listed artists focused on mass tastes.
Even as the years of hyperinflation similar works were in demand.
As for the Chinese and Mongols. The Chinese have always bought Russian painting. But their copyists for the most part do not own the painting, because not trained in the masters.
Although there are exceptions, for example, Nyamosoryn Tsultem, Mongol, but he was in Moscow.
And why does not need to be a brisk trade in paintings and posters? It is profitable.
Creative works. With them the problem - the protection of copyright. For example, they need to be protected from piracy, theft of exhibits ... You should also pay for the exposure to the leased premises, at high prices. Free Soviet times to the supervision of district passed.
As a result, after the trial and costing can only commerce. And creativity can wait for better times. Especially since I am familiar with wealthy buyers with their habit of not paying.




Последний раз редактировалось Artoil-A; 19.08.2013 в 11:09.
Artoil-A вне форума   Ответить с цитированием