Seriy, I truly misunderstood the essence of your message. Twice sounded "convert its popularity" - Bardin, Norshtejn and (apparently you made a reservation) Tatarsky. However, their popularity, their name - unless it is not their talent plus hard work? Much of that time was funded by the state, but they have created a masterpiece, loved by more than one generation.
Цитата:
|
Сообщение от Seriy; 2716451"
The most beautiful idea kraudfandinga, IMHO, - collecting money to create glowing in the night plants by genetic engineering. All who pass will receive seed money.
|
But in return the child to visit the inner sanctum of the famous animation director - to see with your own eyes, touched with their own hands - is it not the same
seeds in the best sense? Which will sprout in children with good taste. And the joy of belonging - is not an empty phrase.
Yes, in the end, too, believe that the main "dividends" is very likely the birth of a masterpiece of animation, which again will be a pleasure to watch (instead of the Teletubbies - or whatever they are - and other nonsense) both adults and children, including including your children.
I'm sorry, pathetic, perhaps, but is it not?