Тема: Talk "for life"
Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 08.08.2013, 10:02 Язык оригинала: Русский       #933
Гуру
 
Аватар для Кирилл Сызранский
 
Регистрация: 26.07.2008
Адрес: РФ, Самара
Сообщений: 75,482
Спасибо: 27,931
Поблагодарили 55,366 раз(а) в 24,306 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 133
Репутация: 102426
Отправить сообщение для Кирилл Сызранский с помощью Skype™
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Pecheneg; 2706381 "
There are paper documents signed by the client and the bank's stamp in duplicate ... what sites ?
I DO NOT BELIEVE !
 And there were " paper documents " with " Wet Seal ", except that the bank signed and stamped by a contract in which credited made ​​changes , and these changes proshlyapil bank .
Scanned document , changed a few lines in his favor , and sent to the bank. There is, of course , the text in small type , too, has not checked and signed the document . The contract is accepted as legitimate, because it cost stamps and signatures of both parties. When a client does not read the fine print - no one pays attention to it, but here the bank clerk had read . Formally, all OK : signature, seal it all, and besides, the document (contract ) does not contain fixes done completely legal.
 Customer brought a contract with their terms - the bank has agreed to them . By law - absolutely fine. Is not it? <! - ~ 7 ~ ->



Кирилл Сызранский вне форума  
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Кирилл Сызранский за это полезное сообщение:
AlexanderG (09.08.2013)