Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 24.07.2008, 12:45 Язык оригинала: Русский       #3
Гуру
 
Аватар для LCR
 
Регистрация: 29.04.2008
Адрес: Париж
Сообщений: 6,211
Спасибо: 18,677
Поблагодарили 38,263 раз(а) в 5,446 сообщениях
Репутация: 29883
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Meister Посмотреть сообщение
anything interesting to me .... how about this? as an interim product, which is then thrown out?
This is really the most interesting question. Of course, you realize that the answer to it I do not.
The article about the collapse seems to think that these artists are not worth that much money, and that this temporary effect, but really, everything will depend on the power of promotion, because in the early career of some of Freud probably people, too, wondered this question, and even now it is not clear whether this painting is worth the money that pay for it.

I mean, when you look at Bacon, like it or not, but visible clot of energy, about which he wrote, Kostya felt that this phenomenon is uncommon. In Freud's painting is nothing I can not see.

I have these artists (Leipzig School) pretty soon - simply because they are engaged in painting, writing inks on canvas, rather than deal with video-audio-One-God-knows-how-are-art and beetles do not kill - but nne Moreover, in the end, it all lisch a kind of neo-academic style.

In any case, the actual purchase is strongly untwisted art, in my opinion - a very risky operation, but of course it is - my opinion on things. You see, now market is euphoric, but for me this very euphoria - a sign of impending correction.



LCR вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 13 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо LCR за это полезное сообщение:
AlexYatskevich (30.10.2010), Annamain (29.09.2010), artcol (30.08.2011), iside (01.02.2010), Jasmin (17.05.2009), K-Maler (24.05.2009), Santa (19.05.2011), sur (13.02.2010), tiffany (10.03.2010), адамович (12.08.2009), Балагур (21.10.2012), Елизавета (02.04.2011), Тамара (08.12.2009)