I do not understand what relationship to realism has Shilov, Glazunov and Tikhomirov? Tsereteli is not for sale, he is so rich, that puts the monuments at their own expense, and are therefore, contains the entire Academy.
As for Russian art, icons remind their Byzantine roots and how they are transformed into various locations in the picturesque school. This is because if too nebylo we artrynka and artists had to live in communes, monasteries, and there to satisfy his passion for zhivopisi.Poetomu they were unknown. Remained the most prominent names and the Greeks and then later. Schools, color harmonies, which so delighted and impressed by Matisse wrote a triptych.
Before the revolution there were two school-Petersburg, kandovaya with German tradition and a bright-Moscow School of Sculpture and zodcheestva and fueled Shchukin and Morozov collections. This effect was considered revolutionary and shocking-tail and Valt and pr.Vse these artists were against the autocracy. Chagall was kommisarom. Malevich, Mayakovsky, Burliuk-if heard something for the King to battle is staged.
Moscow School always been bright and austere style brought Serota and chernotnost, killing painting, but in Moscow in Surikov artists were worthy of the highest ratings, for example. V, N, Zabelin, which you have already missed and it is almost all in private collections in Italy.
Set in a row with Shilov, Glazunov and the Vladimir Tikhomirov can not only color differences, but they and the color and tone in order.
Pslednee time, all immigrants talking about fakes, I think it's just getting your own price.
|