Цитата:
|
Сообщение от Fed; 2631011"
I wish I knew who puts millions for his small minor-picture "their" or overseas, then you might think about the level of recognition abroad.
|
Indeed, the information of the purchaser could make major adjustments in the ranking of paintings (and other works) within the "local-global".
Цитата:
|
Сообщение от mikhael; 2630851"
In the West, it is probably almost do not know, though, because they have enough of their "Shishkin" writing native species similar to painting landscapes. ............ Here, for example, Petrov-Vodkin. The artist, whose painting is unique and surprising. But abroad it, I think, know little about. Or, let's say, the level of talent in his case far exceeds the level of recognition abroad. Why? .. Perhaps there really is some kind of special Russian "genetics" (aesthetics), to catch that, not being Russian, it's hard ...
|
It seems to me that this is the clearest example of comparing artists 'photo' and artists 'philosophers' (I'm trying to say about it in his essay "La Boheme", posted on the blog). Have a chance to be global in both categories, but for different reasons. The former can strike any earthling imaging prowess of the form, the second - a metaphor for the expression of thought. However, the perception of genetically native, called locality, stronger, and that is reflected in the auction price.