Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 07.05.2013, 15:41 Язык оригинала: Русский       #17
Бывалый
 
Регистрация: 11.03.2013
Сообщений: 448
Спасибо: 432
Поблагодарили 1,518 раз(а) в 381 сообщениях
Репутация: 3036
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Eriksson; 2587071"
Lithographs - goods relatively expensive. With any certificate will not be more expensive than their runner.
Allow me to disagree. Certificates Certificates are different. Newspaper circulation too.
Just look at just a few sales Sotheby's:



http://www.sothebys.com/en/auctions/...86/lot.50.html

http://www.sothebys.com/en/auctions/...96/lot.32.html

http://www.sothebys.com/en/auctions/...6/lot.146.html



http://www.sothebys.com/en/auctions/...96/lot.96.html

And what is being proposed (in part) on the market today. From the $ 25 and above.



So what's the difference? Not every reprinted lithography any authority can claim to originality.
There are directories, reason, a series of issues, the number of impressions and all that is known in the art. Therefore, the difference in price.
And what is shown in the beginning of the topic is related to the hundreds of thousands of reprints, which are scattered around the world and have only decorative applications. Yes, and what does not for each painted by Picasso or Miró is a suitable decoration.
Looking at the frame and mat in the beginning of the subject - this is the standard modern design and it is in these, all these little things make the face of consumer goods worldwide.
So respected certifications in the Czech Republic Maria Pospishilovoy have no importance.



Jane Doe вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 3 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо Jane Doe за это полезное сообщение:
John Preston (07.05.2013), Victor-b (07.05.2013), Борис Кон (07.05.2013)