Цитата:
Сообщение от fross
Not very still understand where are the video-art. Film tells a story photo tools (video-art is a short film?), Cartoons tell the story of pictorial means (video art is a cartoon without a history? "), Commercials and video flash series of products (video-art could make these Commercials not shirpotrebnymi?)
I can not determine the purpose of video art, is it simply in order not to idle blank screen?
|
Questions the nail on the head. Now, if among forumistov found a specialist in video-art ... I'm just looking video movies at exhibitions, something contemplate, and theoretical study somehow put out. I decided for myself that video art - is a form of cinema, designed more for a museum or other institutions of fine arts (galleries, Center for Contemporary Art, Biennale), than for the wide screen. Somehow it seems to me that professional highly trained cinema in no hurry to take the video art under his wing. And the perception there is some resemblance to art, where images of stationary (painting, photography). In the museum you can always go to a picture, leave, come back, nothing like not passing. Video art at most - are those commercials, where even if prerveshsya, you still understand what there is - just a glance, as well as in a painting (here I do not mean anything derogatory. Clearly, before some picture can be to stand for hours, having more fun than the video. Here - on the length of time). I used to faithfully serve time in front of the screen, afraid to miss something. Now detained only if I like the way me affects sound and movement. In general, I, of course, the questions are not answered. Once doznayus on their merits, then return to this subject.